Blackboard
Blackboard lets several agents collaborate through a shared workspace (the “blackboard”) of facts, hypotheses and partial results. Each round a coordinator picks which agent acts next, and a decider says when the work is done. Use it for open-ended investigation where no fixed order of work makes sense and agents build on each other’s findings.
The pattern comes from classical AI (Hearsay-II, Erman et al. 1980) and was revived for LLM agents by Han & Zhang 2025 (arXiv:2507.01701); Salemi et al. 2026 (arXiv:2510.01285) report a 13–57% relative improvement on data-discovery tasks.
Pattern
- Initialize the blackboard with the user’s problem statement.
- Each round, the coordinator reads the blackboard and picks one agent to contribute next (or terminates).
- The chosen agent runs with the blackboard view in its prompt and produces a contribution.
- The contribution is appended to the blackboard.
- Loop until the coordinator terminates or
max_roundsis hit. A run stopped by the budget keeps the board’s latest contribution as its output. - The decider synthesizes the final answer from the blackboard.
decider=Nonefalls back to the lastanswer-kind contribution, or the most recent contribution if no answer-kind exists.
Usage
from loomflow import Agent
from loomflow.team import Team
hypothesis = Agent("Propose hypotheses about the data.", model="claude-opus-4-7")
evidence = Agent("Search for evidence and add it to the board.",
model="claude-opus-4-7", tools=[...])
critic = Agent("Critique the current top hypothesis.", model="gpt-4o")
coordinator = Agent(
"Read the blackboard. Decide which agent contributes next, or "
"terminate when the problem is solved.",
model="claude-opus-4-7",
)
decider = Agent(
"Read the full blackboard and produce the final answer.",
model="claude-opus-4-7",
)
team = Team.blackboard(
agents={"hypothesis": hypothesis, "evidence": evidence, "critic": critic},
coordinator=coordinator,
decider=decider,
model="claude-opus-4-7",
)
result = await team.run("Investigate why retention dropped in March.")When Blackboard pays off
- Data-discovery / investigation: Agents contribute partial findings that compound on the board.
- Hypothesis generation + verification: Propose / search / critique cycles.
- Loose coordination: When neither hierarchical (Supervisor) nor peer-handoff (Swarm) fits.
Cost: 3–5× single-agent. Reserve for tasks where the shared workspace genuinely accelerates over hierarchical delegation.
Coordinator API. The coordinator is itself an Agent that
answers with JSON:
{"terminate": bool, "next_agent": str | null, "instruction": str | null}.
"terminate": "false" is read as false and "next_agent": "null"
as no contributor. See
Coordinator decisions.